The court also slapped costs of Rs 60,000 on the woman, the plaintiff, with a direction that Rs 30,000 be paid to the DDA and the other half to the District Legal Service Authority, South.
"Court is not an idle, docile and mindless spectator which is powerless to bring frivolous litigation to an early end and the court is not a slave of proceedings.
"The plaintiff wasted precious court hours as well as caused defendants to bear the brunt of frivolous litigation and the plaintiff must recompense the court as well as defendants," Additional District Judge Neera Bharihoke said.
According to the plaintiff, the suit was initiated in 2000 for declaration, injunction and damages with respect to the suit property i.e. the land measuring 300 bighas adjacent to the Safdarjung Hospital and facing erstwhile Kamal Cinema at Safdarjung Enclave in south Delhi.
Also Read
It further said the suit was barred by Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act 1972 and plaintiffs were attempting to encroach the government land.
The court, while dismissing the suit, said the woman kept changing her stand through the proceedings, with respect of description of the property, extent of the property under their possession, nature of their possession over the suit property as well as the reliefs claimed as the case progressed.
It said the plaintiffs have not been able to raise any bona fide dispute in respect of title of the property.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content