Court frees hospital's ex-medical super in graft case

Bs_logoImage
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 19 2017 | 5:02 PM IST
A top former officer of a government hospital and others have been acquitted by a Delhi court of the charges of cheating and causing a loss of over Rs three crore to the institution by purchasing medical equipments from a foreign supplier at exorbitant rates.
Special Judge Vinay Kumar Khanna absolved Dr O P Jain, the then medical superintendent of G B Pant Hospital here, Consolidated Products Corporation Pvt Ltd and its director Sunil Saigal of the charges of cheating, criminal conspiracy under the IPC and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act in the 20-year-old case.
"This court finds that the prosecution has failed to establish that the accused had cheated the government exchequer or had entered into any conspiracy. It has not been established that they had caused any wrongful gain to themselves or defrauded the government," the judge said.
The court said it has not been proved that Jain gave any pecuniary advantage to Saigal and the firm, an Indian agent of the foreigner suppliers, as commission or as exorbitant price of Rs 3.21 crore.
It said the prosecution has not been able to prove that Jain had adopted illegal means or abused his official position by dishonestly showing favour to the firm and its director.
CBI had lodged a case in July 1997 alleging that Jain, who was the medical superintendent of the hospital from 1988- 1990, and store officer P K Banerjee, who has died, had conspired with Saigal to cheat the institution.
It alleged that they placed 35 orders on Directorate General of Supplies and Disposal (DGS&D) to purchase medical equipments from foreign suppliers, of which Consolidated Products Corporation Pvt Ltd was an Indian agent, without any requirement.
The two public servants dishonestly issued documents to purchase medical equipments from foreign suppliers to cause pecuniary advantage to Saigal and the firm, which imported huge quantities of medical equipments at exorbitant rates, the agency alleged.
During the trial, Jain claimed he had not committed any irregularity or discrepancy in making purchases for the hospital and that during his tenure, he followed all rules and regulations as prescribed by Delhi Government.
The firm and Saigal also denied having any role in the irregularities and claimed that the allegations were false.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

You’ve reached your limit of 10 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories

  • Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 19 2017 | 5:02 PM IST