The court said the procedure adopted by Shri Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd was illegal being in violation of rights of citizens and public interest and also contrary to the fundamental policy of the law.
Additional District Judge Kamini Lau also set aside the arbitration proceedings in which the award was passed against the car owner saying material facts, including selling of the vehicle to a third party, were withheld by the firm from the arbitrator.
The man said he partially paid back loan amount till November 2009 after which the firm illegally snatched away the hypothecated vehicle in December 2009 without any notice and sold it for a meager amount of Rs 25,000 within two years of purchase.
Thereafter, the firm initiated arbitration proceedings to recover the shortfall but did not give any notice to Bisht, he said, adding that, he came to know about the arbitrator's ex-parte award against him when he received a notice from a court on execution petition.
It set aside the arbitration proceedings saying there was no valid service of notice of the proceedings to Bisht and concealed facts from the arbitrator regarding repossession of the vehicle and its further sale to a third party.