Metropolitan Magistrate Shivani Chauhan also took strong exception to the non-suppliance of certain case related documents by the police to Pachauri, who was present in the court, and the prosecutor saying in these circumstances it is hard to believe that prosecution is being conducted at all.
"Verification report of surety and bail bond of accused received. As per the report, the surety is residing as tenant in the given address and that the surety has not provided any permanent address on record.
While issuing notice to the Investigating Officer (IO) to supply deficit documents to Pachauri, the magistrate said, "during the entire proceedings, it is seen that prosecutor was without any police file and was not able to assist the court."
Also Read
It directed that a copy of the order be sent to the Chief Public Prosecutor and concerned DCP for necessary compliance and also issued notice to the IO to remain personally present on next date with relevant copies for the accused.
Pachauri's counsel submitted that the IO had told the
sessions court earlier that statement of 20 TERI employees have been recorded but only four statements have been filed.
After this, the court directed the IO to supply the statements of all TERI employees interrogated in the present case.
The former TERI chief was summoned as accused by the court after it took cognisance of the charge sheet filed against him for allegedly sexually harassing an ex-colleague.
The court, while taking cognisance of charge sheet, had said there was sufficient material to proceed against him under sections 354A (sexual harassment), 354B (assault against woman with intent to disrobe), 354D (stalking), 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult modesty of woman) and 341 (wrongful confinement) of the IPC.