The court said that as the evidence in this case was in the possession of the concerned parties, no special probe was required to collect any evidence by lodging an FIR.
Referring to a Delhi High Court observation, Additional Sessions judge Lokesh Kumar Sharma said that in such cases, court should refrain itself from issuing frequent directions for registration of FIR in a mechanical manner.
The sessions court's order came on a petition filed by a man against a magisterial court order refusing to direct the lodging of an FIR against his wife for allegedly causing burn injuries to him after setting their room on fire.
Also Read
"Hence, the facts and circumstances do not call for any special investigation by the police after lodging of FIR for collection of evidence. Even the alleged incident itself has become almost two years old now, so the chances of collection of any evidence thereof are very bleak," it said.
In his plea, the man had said that the magisterial court had failed to consider that the police did not take any action on his complaint against his wife, despite a medical report supporting his claim.
His wife had denied the allegations and the assertions of the man, a resident of Railways Officers Enclave in south Delhi.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content