The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 2-1 ruling that former Attorney General John Ashcroft, ex-FBI Director Robert Mueller and the former head of an agency that policed immigration may have exceeded the constitutional limits of their authority in the quest to find terrorists responsible for 9/11.
"Detaining individuals as if they were terrorists, in the most restrictive conditions of confinement available, simply because these individuals were, or appeared to be, Arab or Muslim exceeds those limits," according to the majority opinion co-written by Judges Rosemary Pooler and Richard C. Wesley.
In an opinion that was both concurring and dissenting, Judge Reena Raggi said Congress rather than the judiciary should decide whether those who were detained can sue executive policymakers as individuals for money damages.
The opinions stemmed from a 2002 lawsuit seeking unspecified damages. It claimed that federal officials violated rights by imprisoning detainees under harsh conditions on the basis of their race and religion after calls for help from the public prompted 96,000 tips to the FBI from civilians nationwide in the week after the attacks.
More From This Section
Government lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Rachel Meeropol, a Center for Constitutional Rights attorney working on the case, called the ruling a "huge victory."
"I think the public needs to fully grapple with what happened after 9/11 in their name," she said. "These were men who were swept up off the streets of New York and New Jersey and disappeared.... They were treated as terrorists for months until cleared of any connection to terrorism and then deported. This is a stain on our country's history that has never been fully addressed."