The court today extended the police custody of Monserratte and the victim's mother by another four days.
Superintendent of Police (Crime) Karthik Kashyap was asked to submit his explanation by May 16 before Principle District and Sessions Judge B P Deshpande.
The court, which was hearing an application by Crime Branch seeking extension of police custody of Monserratte, said it was not satisfied with the explanation given by Investigation Officer Sudiksha Naik on media leaks.
During the hearing of the application for extending the police custody of Monserratte and the mother, defence lawyer Saresh Lotlikar pointed they had moved an application seeking to restrain police from divulging information about the case to media.
More From This Section
"The explanation has to come how everything is figuring in media. The concerned Superintendent of Police should explain how it is getting leaked to media," Lotlikar said.
Advocate Rajiv Gomes, who also represented Monserratte along with Lotlikar, submitted to the court that the statement given by the victim to the police was verbatim printed in media.
"Let SP give the reply how investigation details were being leaked out. The reply filed by investigating officer (Sudiksha Naik) is not satisfactory. In-charge SP should file a detailed reply," the judge ruled in the open court hall which was packed with the MLA's supporters.
Mayor of Panaji city corporation Surendra Furtado was also in the court.
"We want more time to probe this conversation. We have
to recover the mobile from the accused," said public prosecutor Nita Marathe.
However, defence lawyer Lotlikar argued that allegations that the accused is not cooperating cannot be a ground for keeping him in police custody.
He demanded that Monserratte be sent to judicial custody so that he can file for bail.