Court upholds death sentence of condemned Ohio killer of 11

Bs_logoImage
AP Columbus
Last Updated : Dec 08 2016 | 10:22 PM IST
The Ohio Supreme Court today upheld the conviction and death sentence of a Cleveland man who killed 11 women and hid the remains in and around his home.
The court's 5-2 ruling rejected arguments that attorneys for Anthony Sowell wasted time challenging evidence against him and should have focused instead on sparing him from capital punishment.
The court also rejected a request for a new, open court hearing to challenge the admissibility of Sowell's hourslong police interrogation.
At issue was a 2010 hearing during which a Cleveland judge closed the courtroom while he heard arguments for and against allowing the videotaped interrogation, which lasted for more than 11 hours.
The judge ultimately allowed its use, and most of it was played during Sowell's trial.
The judge identified an overriding interest that supported closing that hearing, Justice Terrence O'Donnell said.
As a result, "the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the limited closure of the courtroom," O'Donnell said.
Justice William O'Neill and Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor dissented, saying a new hearing should be held.
In "a criminal-justice system governed by the rule of law, a serial murderer's trial is subject to the same constitutional protections as the trial of a low-level thief," O'Neill wrote.
Sowell, 57, was indicted in 2009 and convicted and sentenced in 2011. Jurors found Sowell guilty of killing 11 women from June 2007 to July 2009. Police found their mostly nude bodies throughout his home after a woman escaped and said she had been raped in the house.
Despite the ruling, an execution is years away. Sowell could still appeal through the federal courts.
While Ohio plans three executions next year, it hasn't said if it has enough drugs for additional executions. Two dozen men are on the state's death row.
New lawyers for Sowell argued a better strategy would have been to concede Sowell's overwhelming guilt and push for life without parole based on his background, including a chaotic childhood.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

You’ve reached your limit of 10 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 08 2016 | 10:22 PM IST