A bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur reserved the judgement after senior advocates Fali S Nariman, appearing for the AIADMK Chief and K T S Tulsi, who represented other convicts and T R Adhyarijina, the lawyer for DMK leader K Anbazhagan, concluded their rejoinder arguments in the case.
Referring to earlier order of the apex court, Andhyarujina said, "here is a special public prosecutor who is hand in glove with an accused".
"The legal question is whether Bhawani Singh, whose appointment was limited to conduct the trial, can claim to come and appear in appellate court and say that I am the PP," he said, adding that it is "strange" that the convict is supporting him.
Also Read
"The appointment for appearing in the High Court has been done by Tamil Nadu," he said.
Nariman, counsel for Jayalalithaa, had come out strongly in support of the SPP saying, "Bhawani Singh is not an intruder. He has a notification in his favour and in such matters, the de-facto doctrine also comes in his favour."
He had said the apex court, in 2013, had quashed a notification of the state government removing Singh as SPP and as a consequence, the earlier notification appointing him as the SPP, remained.