This was stated in a counter-affidavit filed by DAE under-secretary T G Ravindran in response to a suo motu PIL taken up by the court relating to alleged illegal mining of BSM in some southern districts of Tamil Nadu.
The counter-affidavit refuted the allegations by Amicus Curie V Suresh that the Atomic Minerals Directorate (AMD) had failed to stop several players from carrying out the mining operations beyond the permitted quantities.
As a consequence, these facilities no longer required licence from the DAE, the counter-affidavit submitted, indicating that it cannot be blamed for any illegal mining of BSM.
Referring to the allegation of non-applicability of relevant rules on firms involved in mining of atomic minerals, it said only a few facilities were producing minerals such as ilmenite, rutile, garnet, zircon and sillimanite.
Also Read
These generate relatively less quantities of monazite enriched tailings and the monazite content was generally between 10 per cent and 25 per cent.
The counter-affidavit submitted that it was not fair on the part of the amicus curie to accuse the AMD of failure to stop the mining operations of the firms which were carrying out the mining allegedly beyond permitted quantity.
Rejecting the charge that the DAE had issued handling licence to VV Minerals to mine ilmenite for which it did not have mining lease, it said the state government can issue permits for mining to them only after the grant of valid mining lease and ensuring that all statutory clearances were obtained by them.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content