Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna refused to call the Chief Minister as a defence witness in the case on the request of Akshay Thakur, an accused.
"The request to summon the Chief Minister to prove the alleged controversy or alleged false recording of statement of the prosecutrix is nothing but an abuse of the process," the court said, which also declined the request of the accused to summon SDM Usha Chaturvedi as a defence witness.
In December last year, the SDM had claimed that three senior police officers had interfered with the recording of the victim's statement. Dikshit had written to Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde, demanding a probe into the matter.
"Prosecution witness (PW-27) Dr Usha Chaturvedi has already been examined/cross examined extensively. Hence, the request is declined," the court said.
"The witness... Proposes to depose that accused Akshay left Delhi on December 15, 2012 and reached his village, in his home town on December 16, 2012.
"Since during recording of his statement, accused Akshay challenged his presence in the bus, so witness at serial no. 2 to 8 and at serial no. 11 seems to be relevant but since all of these witnesses pertain to one fact, the accused may produce any five of these witnesses in his defence," the judge said.