A direction to this effect was given by Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Gautam Manan to a magisterial court.
The judge allowed the man's appeal challenging the magisterial court's order directing him to pay Rs 5,000 per month in maintenance to his estranged wife and his children, saying the magistrate had not considered the proof about the woman's income and assets while fixing the amount.
"Before passing the orders of the maintenance, the trial court ought to have directed both the contesting parties to disclose their income and assets on affidavits...Hence the orders suffers from material irregularity and is set aside," the ASJ said.
The judge directed the magistrate to re-decide the quantum of maintenance after taking the affidavits of the parties (man and woman) and after giving due consideration to their rival contentions in respect of their earnings.
More From This Section
He had claimed that he was living in a remote village, 1000 km away from Delhi, and that his wife had already taken away sufficient jewellery and clothes with her.
He also claimed that he was ready to keep his wife in his house but despite his repeated requests, she had refused to stay with him.