Kejriwal's counsel referred to the November 17 order of the Supreme Court, which had remanded the matter back to the Delhi High Court asking it to decide on the plea, and told Justice I S Mehta that the high court would now have to hear the matter on merits.
"Now the high court will have to hear the matter on merits and decide the issue," Kejriwal's counsel said after which the court directed that the matter be listed for hearing on February 16 next year.
The apex court, while remanding back the matter to the high court to decide the plea of Kejriwal and others seeking discharge in the case, had made it clear that the trial court proceedings in the defamation complaint would continue.
The clarification regarding continuance of the trial court proceedings was made when Sibal's lawyer had expressed apprehension that Kejriwal and others may use the order for remanding the case back to the high court to seek a stay on the pending proceedings before the Patiala House courts here.
Also Read
Kejriwal had held a press conference on May 15, 2013, alleging conflict of interest on part of Sibal, saying he had appeared in the court for a telecom firm when his father was the communications minister.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content