The Delhi Chief Minister had sought that the replication (reply) filed by Jaitley in response to his written submission in the second defamation lawsuit be trashed on several grounds including that the usage of 'scandalous' words by his former counsel was based on hearsay.
Justice Manmohan said the additional points raised by Jaitley in his replication to Kejriwal's written submission were "relevant" as they "crystalise" the Union Minister's stand and thus, "can neither be termed scandalous, nor frivolous or vexatious or unnecessary or abuse of process of law".
The second suit had claimed that the then counsel of the Chief Minister, Ram Jethmalani, had made derogatory remarks against Jaitley in the proceedings of another defamation suit between the two and five other AAP leaders allegedly at the instance of Kejriwal.
Kejriwal has denied that he had instructed Jethmalani to use the derogatory words, a claim which Jaitley has termed as false and for which he has also sought perjury action against the Delhi chief minister.
Also Read
In his response filed through advocate Anupam Shrivastav, Kejriwal has denied that he has committed any perjury or made any false statement supported by an affidavit under oath.
He has also said there were no instructions from him to Jethmalani to use objectionable remarks against Jaitley.
The senior lawyer, however, had categorically stated before the joint registrar that he had received specific instruction from Kejriwal to use derogatory words against Jaitley.
Jethmalani, who in September announced his retirement from over a seven-decade long career as an advocate, had used certain words while cross-examining the Union Minister in a separate Rs 10 crore defamation case filed by the BJP leader against the AAP convenor and five others of the party in 2015.
Jaitley has denied all the allegations and also claimed that these had harmed his reputation.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content