Delhi HC's status quo order on proceedings against Asthana extended till Nov 14

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 01 2018 | 6:35 PM IST

The Delhi High Court on Thursday extended till November 14 its order directing the CBI to maintain status quo on proceedings against Special Director Rakesh Asthana, allegedly involved in a bribery case even as the agency said that the complaint against him and others "clearly discloses the cognisable offences".

"The interim order to continue till the next date of hearing, that is, November 14," said Justice Najmi Waziri before whom the CBI opposed Asthana's plea seeking quashing of the FIR, stating that there was incriminating material against the special director in the case, the investigation of which was at the nascent stage.

In reply to the petitions by Asthana and Deputy SP Devender Kumar who was on Wednesday granted bail by a trial court, the CBI said it was "handicapped" in its probe against them as the case files and documents have been sent to the CVC for scrutiny following the Supreme Court's order directing the vigilance body to complete an inquiry against CBI Director Alok Kumar Verma by November 12.

Kumar, earlier the investigating officer in a case involving meat exporter Moin Qureshi, was arrested on the allegations of forgery in recording the statement of businessman Sathish Babu Sana who had alleged to have paid bribe to get relief in the case.

The CBI, Asthana, Kumar and the Centre opposed in the high court the plea of Additional Superintendent of Police S S Gurm to be heard in the matter. Gurm has been transferred from Delhi to Jabalpur in the wake of a feud between Verma and Asthana.

The court was hearing separate pleas of Asthana and Kumar seeking quashing of CBI's FIR against them in the bribery case.

Also Read

The proceedings also witnessed a controversy when there was a verbal spat between two advocates as to who will represent the Central Bureau of Investigation in the matter.

Additional Solicitor General Vikramjit Banerjee, who came for the first time since the matter came up for hearing in the high court on October 23, said he has been instructed to appear for the CBI.

Advocate K Raghavacharyulu, who has been appearing for the CBI, opposed the appearance of Banerjee, contending that he has been appointed by the agency to represent it from the beginning when the petition was filed by Asthana.

"I have been appointed as the special public prosecutor in the case," Raghavacharyulu submitted before the court which did not comment on the issue.

Later, Banerjee said he will seek instructions from the competent authority and make it clear for the high court as to who among the two will appear on behalf of the probe agency.

When the judge, after some time, took up the similar quashing petition of middleman Manoj Prasad, the ASG was not present in the hearing which invited the attention of the court.

When the court asked where was the ASG, Raghavacharyulu said his instruction was that he has to represent the agency.

The court interjected and said, "He (ASG) is also the counsel. If he has instructions to appear in this court, he will appear. Anyway, if he is not here, you (Raghavacharyulu) proceed."
In the reply, the CBI said, "This court categorically held that when an FIR is challenged by way of a writ petition, more particularly, in Prevention of Corruption Cases, allegations in the FIR are to be seen whether they disclose the cognisable offence or not and the roving enquiry at this stage is impermissible."
"It is submitted that the FIR and the complaint clearly discloses the cognisable offences and accordingly the CBI has registered the FIR and proceeded with the investigation."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 01 2018 | 6:35 PM IST

Next Story