The apex court said refusal to conduct the proceedings as per the employee's preferred language will violate his right to effective defence and to effectively put forth his case.
"If the said is not done, it would infringe the rule that justice must not only be done, but also seen to be done. However, abundant caution must be exercised in ensuring that this right to defend must not be reduced to mere lip service by the authority.
The court passed the order on an appeal filed by a government employee Mithilesh Kumar Singh challenging the proceedings against him and punishment of reduction in his pay scale on the ground that inquiry was conducted against him in English against his desire.
Advocate Pyoli Swatija, appearing for the petitioner, contended that it was a violation of fair justice and urged the court to set aside the proceedings against the employee.