A division bench comprising justices V Ramasubramanian and T Mathivanan gave the direction while dismissing a petition by Chief Personal Officer of Southern Railway, denying appointment to a woman on the ground that she was a diabetic.
"In the absence of any scientific evidence to show that a diabetic will not be able to discharge the duties of office, it is not possible to accept the stand taken by the authorities," the judges said.
The court pointed out that a global report by the Indian Diabetes Research Foundation had stated that 40.9 million Indians are diabetic. "Therefore, it is not possible to accept that they are unemployable or that if employed, they would become a liability on the employer."
Railways had challenged the order Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, directing it to appoint a woman candidate Pushpam to a suitable Grade D post in 12 weeks.
More From This Section
Pushpam was one among 58 candidates declared medically unfit. She then filed an appeal for a medical re-examination, which was done. But Railways in a July 2 2012 certificate opined that she was unfit for employment in A2 category.
She then moved the CAT, which allowed her application following a decision by the High Court in 2013.
The Railways then filed a petition against the HC order.
The bench, while dismissing Railways' petition, reminded it of the earlier order where mention had been made of India being the diabetic capital of the world and that diabetes was more of a disorder than a disease.
The bench dealt with WHO reports on diabetics and rejected the contention that Pushpam was not eligible for appointment and directed Railways to issue appointment to her in eight weeks.