The transparency panel also asked the Law Ministry to disclose what action has been taken in the matter related to alleged leak of a judgement which was posted on a private website before it was delivered by him.
Deciding the plea of RTI activist Subhash Agrawal, Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu also asked Central Public Information Officer of the Supreme Court to furnish details of the number of complaints rejected or accepted against the judges.
In his order, Acharyulu said there is no system for redressal of grievances in any court of India, and no mechanism to receive complaints against judiciary.
He said a comprehensive mechanism needs to be put in place to ensure both answerability and access to information about administration of justice without compromising the basic constitutional character of the independence of Judiciary.
More From This Section
Agrawal had sought copies of complaints received at the Union Law Ministry against Kabir dated May 25, 2013 by former Justice V R Krishna Iyer, and complaint from M Furquan as forwarded from the President's Secretariat as referred in some news report.
He had also sought to know the action taken related to probe into leak of the Supreme Court verdict dated July 18, 2013 in the matter of "Christian Medical College, Vellore vs Union of India", on a private website several hours before its pronouncement in the court.