Justice C.T.Selvam of the Madurai Bench, dismissing a petition filed by the man, whose former wife had initiated the proceedings, said the Supreme Court had held that the conduct of a man even prior to enactment of the PWDVA could be taken into account by the court concerned before passing orders in the proceedings.
Hence the petitioner's submission that proceedings initiated in the capacity of being the wife of the alleged offender could not be allowed to continue after the woman had lost that status, was not acceptable, the judge said.
The petitioner's counsel said the definition of "aggrieved person" does not contain the crucial words at "any point of time". Hence the past relationship should be excluded. But the judge rejected the argument.