The apex court said while the company can be compensated later if it succeeds in its appeal, it will be impossible to provide restitution to the lakhs of commuters from whom the toll fee would be collected to repay them on dismissal of the Special Leave Petition (SLP).
A bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur also asked the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) to assist in the matter and verify the company's claim that the total cost of the project has not been recovered and submit a report within four weeks.
While declining the firm's plea to stay the high court's October 26 judgement restraining it from levying the cess, the bench said, "We do not agree with the submission that the petitioner (firm) would suffer irreparable loss if the judgment of the High Court is not stayed."
"It will be impossible to provide restitution to the lakhs of commuters from whom the fee would be collected to repay them in the event of dismissal of the SLP.
Also Read
The high court, on October 26, had brought cheers to millions of commuters by ruling that no toll will be collected henceforth from those using the 9.2 km-long, eight-lane DND flyway. The order was passed as the high court allowed a PIL by the Federation of Noida Residents' Welfare Association.
The firm had challenged the high court verdict saying it
To this, the bench said prima facie the issue that arose in the appeal required a detailed scrutiny as conflicting claims have been made regarding recovery of the total cost of the project by the concessionaire.
"To resolve the dispute, it is appropriate that an independent agency is requested to examine the relevant records of the DND flyway. The said agency should examine the reports of the independent auditors appointed by the petitioner and submit a report regarding the correctness of the petitioner's claim that the total cost of the project has not been recovered," it said while asking the CAG to verify the firm's claims.
"The petitioner shall cooperate in all respects with the CAG and provide all documents, information and details as sought," it said and added that the copy of this order be provided to the CAG expeditiously.
The bench granted three weeks time to the respondents, including the residents' Federation, for filing their replies and listed the matter after four weeks.
On the toll collecting firm's plea for interim stay on HC order, the apex court bench had said, "You have only ten kms of highway and you claim that you have made a road to the moon. ... You have done well but not something (great)."
(Reopens LGD44)
The court had said that the "right to levy and collect user fee from the commuters as conferred upon the concessionaire under the concession agreement suffers from excessive delegation and is contrary to the provisions UP Industrial Development Act".
"They have further realised user fee/toll two-and-a half-year thereafter between April 1, 2014 and September 30, 2016 which, as per the collection of user fee in the year 2013-14 would work out to an additional sum of Rs 300 crore (approx).