Researchers from Northeastern University used so-called "sociometers" - wearable devices roughly the size of smartphones - to collect real-time data about the user's social interactions.
Northeastern University professor David Lazer provided a group of men and women with sociometers and split them in two different social settings for a total of 12 hours.
In the first setting, master's degree candidates were asked to complete an individual project, about which they were free to converse with one another for the duration of a 12-hour day.
They found that women were only slightly more likely than men to engage in conversations in the lunch-break setting, both in terms of long- and short-duration talks.
More From This Section
In the academic setting, in which conversations likely indicated collaboration around the task, women were much more likely to engage in long conversations than men.
That effect was true for shorter conversations, too, but to a lesser degree. These findings were limited to small groups of talkers. When the groups consisted of six or more participants, it was men who did the most talking.
"So it's a very particular scenario that leads to more interactions. The real story here is there's an interplay between the setting and gender which created this difference," Lazer said.
The research was published in the journal Scientific Reports.