'Don't play with orders of the court', SC tells Haridwar, Roorkee officials

The Supreme Court on Monday rebuked two officials of Uttarakhand government for "playing with orders of the court" and violating its direction on demolishing "unauthorised" buildings without giving notice to the encroachers.

The apex court said it was not inclined to accept the apology or the defence of the contemnor officers who have not shown any sense of "regret or genuine remorse" for their actions.

A bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul said the affidavit filed by the two officers -- District Magistrate, Haridwar, and Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Roorkee -- were not satisfactory and it was a case of wilful disobedience of the court's order.

The bench did not accept the defence of the woman IAS officer that she was a 2015 batch officer and was too junior to understand the implication of the court's order.

"Playing around with court's order is not a healthy exercise. She should be told. We will hold them guilty of contempt of court," the bench said, adding that it was inclined to sentence them to "till the rising of the court".

The bench gave one last opportunity to the officers to come up with their fresh affidavit in the contempt plea filed against them by one of the encroachers, whose building was demolished.

The apex court had on December 4, pulled up both the officials for demolishing "unauthorised" buildings without giving notice to the encroachers despite apex court orders.

The top court had given one last opportunity to the two officials to explain as to why they demolished the buildings despite it asking them to first issue the eviction notice to the encroachers and hear their objections.

The counsel appearing for both the officers said that they tender an unconditional apology but the orders were received after the demolition exercise was over.

The bench had earlier refused to hear the petitioner Noor Aslam, who has moved the court seeking contempt action against the officials for non-compliance of the court order.

The apex court had on November 22 said: "We are inclined to take the view that before evicting any person the concerned authority is obliged to give a notice and hear the objections that may be raised."