"He's good at no. 5, or even 4, because of his ability to play with the tail-enders, the range of shots he possesses and for the opportunity he would get to face the second new ball too," a visibly reluctant Dravid told former Test opener Aakash Chopra at the launch of the latter's book "The Insider" here.
The debate has arisen as Rahane, who has been the most consistent of all Indian middle order batsmen on the overseas tours to South Africa, New Zealand, England and South Africa - at no. 5 - was asked to bat at no. 3 in the second and third Tests against Lanka, both played at Colombo and won by India for a 2-1 series win, after he had batted at no. 5 in the lost first Test at Galle.
His Mumbai teammate Rohit Sharma, who flopped at no. 3 in the series opener, made two half centuries (79 and 50) and also got good starts in the other two innings in which he was demoted to no. 5 - the slot previously occupied by Rahane.
More From This Section
Another cricket legend, Sunil Gavaskar, was scathing in his views about the change in batting order during the second Test while talking to a TV channel.
"But he will do whatever is needed. He comes from Rahul Dravid school. Rahul had also batted at no. 3 and 5. He's Rahane's mentor and he (Rahane) will do the same thing," Gavaskar said.