The MLAs also sought time to respond to the charges made in the second set of documents by complainant and advocate Prashant Patel.
"We want to study the High Court judgment, so we have have sought time from the Election Commission," said Alka Lamba, AAP's Chandani Chowk MLA, adding that the legislators would file their reply on October 7. A counter-reply would be filed by Patel on October 14.
Patel said the court order had no bearing on the EC adding that this was a "ploy" of the legislators to delay the matter.
He had made an initial complaint in July 2015 and filed another set of documents in December 2015 in response to queries by Election Commission.
More From This Section
The MLAs objected to it saying the EC cannot consider the second set of documents filed by Patel after the President had already sought opinion on the first petition.
They insisted the second set of documents were not maintainable. Patel, however, argued that the second set was "not a fresh petition but a response to details sought by the EC".
"We also want to respond to the second set of documents. Plus, we need the copy of details shared by the Delhi government in matter related to parliamentary secretaries. So, we need time for it," AAP's Kasturba Nagar MLA Madanlal said.