"I have no hesitation in holding that the Child Welfare Committee was well within its powers to award compensation to the child victim even if it had misspelled the said term of 'compensation' as minimum wages and thus, no illegality or infirmity can be found in or inferred from the impugned order on this score alone," Additional Sessions Judge Lokesh Kumar Sharma said.
Pandey had filed an appeal against the order of CWC, which directed the employer to pay Rs 60,840 by way of demand draft in favour of the minor child, who was employed as a domestic help.
CWC had also ordered registration of an FIR against him for offences under Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act.
Pandey had contended that CWC, constituted under the JJ Act, was not a competent authority and did not have jurisdiction under Minimum Wages Act to issue directions to pay salary.
More From This Section
The court also held that CWC was well within its rights and powers to facilitate the registration of FIR in the present case and "no illegality or infirmity can be pointed out on this account".
According to the prosecution, the 12-year-old girl was allegedly employed by Pandey at his residence at Vasant Kunj as a domestic servant for a period of about eight months from February 2013 to September 2013 but no wages were paid to her.
On a written complaint of the victim's father, an FIR was registered against Pandey under section 26 of the JJ Act (exploitation of juvenile or child employee) at the behest of CWC.