The Select Committee of Rajya Sabha on the Enemy Property (Amendment and Validation) Bill, 2016, headed by BJP MP Bhupendra Yadav, has been asked to carry out detailed scrutiny of the measure that seeks to guard against claims of succession or transfer of properties left by people who migrated to Pakistan and China after the wars and amend the Enemy Property Act, 1968.
The 1968 Act regulates these enemy properties, and lists the powers of the Custodian.
The panel has been tasked to scrutinise the Bill and submit its report in the opening week of the second part of the Budget session.
The first meeting of the panel today saw a detailed presentation about the Bill. The next meeting of the panel will be held on April 4.
More From This Section
Home Secretary Rajiv Mehrishi, who was to give a presentation, could not attend the meeting due to his engagement in Padma award ceremony, sources said.
Since it was the maiden meeting of the committee, which was set up on March 15, besides holding preliminary discussion on the Bill, it also discussed the manner in which it will take up the issue.
"It being the first meeting, members were briefed in detail about the salient features of the Bill by the officers. A number of members wanted to know what laws exist in Pakistan and Bangladesh to deal with similar situation there," a source said.
referring the Bill, which seeks to amend the Enemy Property Act, 1968, and the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, as passed by Lok Sabha, to the panel.
The panel was asked to submit the report by the last day of the first week of the second part of the Budget session, which begins on April 25 and wraps up on May 13.
The Bill was passed by Lok Sabha on March 9 with the government overruling demands by some opposition parties that it be sent to the Standing Committee.
The Enemy Property Act was enacted in 1968 and provided for the continuous vesting of enemy property with the Custodian of Enemy Property for India.
The amendments say that once an enemy property is vested in the Custodian, it shall continue to be vested in him as enemy property irrespective of whether the enemy, enemy subject or enemy firm has ceased to be an enemy due to reasons such as death, etc.
The amendments are aimed at plugging the loopholes in the Act to ensure that enemy properties that have been vested in the Custodian continue that way and do not revert to the enemy subject or enemy firm.