Special CBI judge Alok Agarwal acquitted the accused observing that she had explained the source of income and the CBI's allegations against her regarding alleged amassing of wealth of over Rs 41 lakh could not be substantiated.
The court also noted that the amount arrived at by the probe agency during its investigation cannot be termed as "disproportionate to her known sources of income".
"Therefore, she cannot be convicted under section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Accordingly, the accused... Is hereby acquitted of the charge against her in this case," the judge said.
CBI had claimed that on the basis of a tip-off, a case was lodged on March 9, 2004 against the accused for allegedly amassing assets disproportionate to her known source of income.
More From This Section
It said that a search was carried out on March 10, 2004 and for the purpose of calculating disproportionate assets, a period between April 1, 1994 and March 10, 2004 was fixed.
It said that the accused was in possession of a house at Panchsheel Enclave, a shop at Nehru Place and agricultural land in village Kapashera, apart from various other monetary investments.
However, the prosecution failed to substantiate its claim during the trial in the case.