The findings suggest that the size of our pupils is not simply a mechanistic response, but one that also adjusts to a subjective sense of brightness.
"Visual imagery is a private and subjective experience which is not accompanied by strongly felt or visible physiological changes," said psychological scientist and lead researcher Bruno Laeng of the University of Oslo.
"It is a particularly difficult topic to research, as years of controversy about the nature of mental imagery testifies," Laeng said.
Initially, participants were asked to look at a screen while triangles of different levels of brightness appeared. When they were later asked to actively imagine those triangles, the participants' pupils varied in size according to the triangle's original brightness.
More From This Section
When imagining brighter triangles, their pupils were smaller. But when imagining darker triangles, their pupils were larger.
In a series of additional experiments, the researchers found that participants' pupils also changed in diameter when imagining a sunny sky, a dark room, or a face in the sun compared with a face in the shade, as if in preparation for experiencing the various scenes.
"Because humans cannot voluntarily constrict the eyes' pupils, the presence of pupillary adjustments to imaginary light presents a strong case for mental imagery as a process based on brain states similar to those which arise during actual perception," said Laeng.
The researchers suggest the work may have further applications, potentially allowing them to probe the mental experiences of animals, babies and even patients with severe neurological disorders.
The study was published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.