Refuting the woman's claim that she had not resisted Farooqui's act as she feared meeting the same fate as the December 16 gangrape victim, the defence counsel said if she was under such threat, then why did she remain at his house for over 30 minutes even after the alleged incident.
"After the alleged assault, she had booked a cab but cancelled it before her ride was slated to begin. She also waited in the house on being asked by Ashish (Farooqui's friend). Why did she listen to him?
Commencing final arguments, the defence counsel denied the charges levelled against the film-maker and also refuted the sequence of events narrated by the woman before the court.
The arguments of the defence remained inconclusive and would continue tomorrow.
Also Read
The prosecution had yesterday concluded its arguments in the case, which is being heard on a daily basis, saying all the evidence on record proved that Farooqui had raped the 30-year-old US native.
The court had commenced hearing final arguments last week when the police had said the testimony of the alleged victim, who had trusted Farooqui and considered him a friend, showed that she was sexually assaulted.
The trial in the case had commenced on September 9 last year when the woman had recorded her statement.
The American research scholar from Columbia University, during in-camera proceedings, had alleged that Farooqui had raped her at his Sukhdev Vihar residence here on March 28 last year and later apologised to her in several e-mails exchanged between them.
The police had on June 19 lodged an FIR against Farooqui on the complaint of the woman after which he was arrested. The charge sheet was filed against him on July 29.