Last year, researchers reported detecting the afterglow from a fast radio burst, which would pinpoint the precise position of the burst's origin, a longstanding goal in studies of these mysterious events.
These findings were quickly called into question by follow-up observations.
"Part of the scientific process is investigating findings to see if they hold up. In this case, it looks like there's a more mundane explanation for the original radio observations," said Peter Williams, from Harvard University.
"We don't even know if they come from inside our galaxy or if they're extragalactic," said Edo Berger, from Harvard.
Also Read
Most FRBs have been identified in archival data, making immediate follow-up impossible. The new event, FRB 150418, is only the second one to be identified in real time.
Radio observations reported in the journal Nature purportedly showed a fading radio afterglow associated with the FRB. That afterglow was used to link the FRB to a host galaxy located about 6 billion light-years from Earth.
If the initial observations had been an afterglow, it should have completely faded away. Instead researchers found a persistent radio source whose strength varied randomly by a factor of three, often reaching levels that matched the initial brightness of the claimed afterglow.
The initial study also saw this source, but unluckily missed any rebrightenings.
"The radio emission from this source goes up and down, but it never goes away. That means it can't be associated with the fast radio burst," said Berger.
The variations we see from Earth may be due to a process called "scintillation," where interstellar gases make an intrinsically steady radio beacon appear to flicker, just like Earth's atmosphere makes light from stars twinkle.
The source itself might also be varying as the active galactic nucleus periodically gulps a little more matter and flares in brightness.
The study appears in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.