The court's direction came on an appeal filed by a working mother against the magistrate court's order which had denied her the interim maintenance from her husband for the unborn baby on the ground that foetus is not covered within the definition of a child.
"Though the mother is also earning and having a good income, the same does not entitle the husband to shirk his responsibility when he is also liable to support his child and for any failure and neglect by the father qua the child yet to be born, is certainly domestic violence within contemplation of this special enactment and the object it strives to achieve," Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Sudesh Kumar said.
"...The order is hereby set aside and I hereby hold that an unborn child does come within the definition of a child and the complainant seeking maintenance for her unborn child in the form of her upkeep, welfare and an extra care required during the pregnancy was entitled to the same," it said.
It said that a woman during pregnancy needs extra care and attention and a good diet and she should be free from stress.
More From This Section
The court remanded the matter back to the magistrate to determine the extent of maintenance qua the unborn child as per law.
According to appeal filed by the woman, they got married in 2013 and she alleged that within one month of the marriage, her husband started harassing her physically and abused her parents and sister.