"India has a well-established legislative, administrative and judicial framework to safeguard IPRs which meets its obligations under TRIPS, and has withheld the test of severe international scrutiny".
"We are glad to note that India has not been given the Priority Country status as this could have had serious ramifications on economic, political and trade sanctions," Ficci Secretary General A Didar Singh said.
Meanwhile, India made it clear it will not take part in any unilateral investigation by the US on its intellectual property rights (IPRs).
Special 301 Report is an annual review of the global state of IPR protection and enforcement.
Also Read
The Obama administration had been strongly criticising India's investment climate and IPR laws, especially in the pharmaceutical and solar sectors.
The US International Trade Commission had raised the matter of India's rejection of patents for Bristol-Myers Squibb's Sprycel and Novartis AG's Glivec. It said Indian IPR laws were not compliant with Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) under WTO.