Jaitley said that Rao, under whom economic reforms were initiated in 1991, was forced to come out of the Nehruvian mindset to help avoid a sovereign credit default and added that the Congress leader was "not a great reformer" or a "big liberaliser".
Citing an an incident mentioned in a book on Rao (Half Lion: How PV Narasimha Rao transformed India), Jaitely said, "When Rao was the law minister of Andhra, his first decision was that all private colleges should be abolished and only government should run the colleges."
Contesting the assertion that Rao was the force behind the liberalisation drive, he said, "it was not that former prime minister Narasimha Rao was a big liberaliser."
Jaitley blamed the now much maligned Hindu rate of growth to the Nehruvian economics.
Also Read
"While in the 1950s and the 60s we had limited resources, the 70s and 80s were wasted decades, which contained our growth rates at 1-2 per cent per annum," he said.
As an example, he cited the growth of the telecom sector after the entry of private sector. "From 1947 to 1995, the government thought that giving telephone connection was something which it should only do it. In the first 50 years, less than one per cent of the Indians had telephones.
"In the first two-three decades after the Independence,
our growth was around 1-2 per cent, or maximum 2.5 per cent. Compared to world economic growth, we were nowhere.
Stating that our Asian neighbours marched ahead during this time, he cited the exampale of Japan, Korea and Taiwan in particular which adopted technology and linked themselves to the global economy so that the whole world became a market for them.