A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw also declined a request for registration of a criminal case against Delhi Chief Minster Arvind Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia under Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) and conducting day-to-day trial under high court supervision.
It also refused to look into the allegation of advocate M L Sharma through a PIL that the party, Kejriwal, Sisodia, former AAP members and advocate Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan were funded by the Central Intelligence Agency through companies and trusts.
"In the present case, we do not find any reason as to why the investigative agencies to whom the petitioner has already complained would not look into or are not looking into the allegation or would not discover the truth," the bench said.
The court said it did not find any case or the need for any direction to be issued and dismissed the petition with clarification that "neither should the dismissal of this petition be considered as this court having expressed any view on the merits of the allegations of the petitioner nor should any observation herein be read as our having found any merit therein."
More From This Section
The Intelligence Bureau (IB) report had also found nothing against AAP, the Centre had stated.
AAP had also said that the party has even written to the
Supreme Court to set up a special investigation team (SIT) to probe the funding of all major national and regional parties in the country.
Contending that Kejriwal and some of its members of receiving foreign funds, Sharma on February 4 this year had moved an application seeking CBI probe against the Home Ministry officials, who in their report had earlier stated that donations made by eight foreign residents to AAP, were not in violation of FCRA.
In the facts of the present case we do not find either of the said requirements to have been met, it added.
Denying violation of foreign exchange or other laws, AAP had earlier contended that the PIL accusing it and its founding members of having illegally received foreign funding was "scandalous, frivolous, motivated and baseless".
AAP had claimed that it has "very small amount of funds and has the most transparent method of political funding among all parties".
The PIL had also alleged that "undisclosed funding to AAP was coming from terrorist groups" and that the party had succeeded in stalling Home Ministry probe against it and managed to get a favorable reply to mislead this court.