Setting aside the detention orders of eight youth passed by the Commissioner of Police, Chennai, the Division bench, comprising Justices V Dhanapalan and G Chokkalingam suggested there be a specially-designated compound to reform the young detenus, to train them in several reforms, including security, yoga and medical classes, computer training.
The bench stated this while allowing the habeous corpus petitions of several detenus, including one Thirupathy, against whom the detention orders were passed under 'Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug offenders, Forest offenders, Goonda's, Immoral Traffic offenders, sand offenders, Slum Grabbers and video Piracy Act 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) (Goonda's Act)' for their involvement in many IPC offences.
"Such acts prejudicial to interest of society and public, disturbing public order, peace and tranquility can be curbed only by preventive detention laws or regular laws. Though jail authorities have to follow prison manual and the law under which they are governed and are empowered to take decisions as per them, it was equally important they provide for some kind of information among the youth, who are the foundation of society and future generation of the Nation", the bench said.
It suggested the state government consult all stakeholders involved, particularly prison and law enforcing authorities, social activists and lawyers, who mainly appear in these cases and formulate a scheme to have a separate reformation centre for the youths.