A bench comprising Justices S A Bobde and L Nageswara Rao said the responses and suggestions be handed over to senior advocate R Basant, who is assisting the court as an amicus curiae in the matter, to enable him convene a meeting with all the parties and formulate a draft proposal, which would be dealt with by the top court.
During the hearing, the bench observed that the issue before it was "completely non-adverserial" and all the parties should sit together and deliberate upon it.
The court was told that the states and high courts, which have not yet filed their responses and suggestions, could furnish them by March 16 so that the amicus could prepare the draft proposal.
The apex court had last year decided to take up the matter on its own while hearing a criminal appeal related to a case in Kerala.
Giving details of the specific issues flagged by the senior lawyer, the apex court had noted that he has highlighted several issues.
These included the "pernicious practice of the Trial Judge leaving the recording of deposition to the clerk concerned and recording of evidence going on in more than one case in the same court room at the same time, ... has to be disapproved strongly and discontinued forthwith".