He said the government may also seek to get a "special consideration" from the apex court for the tourist state.
"Following the Supreme Court order pronounced on March 31, around 1,000 out of 3,000-odd outlets (in Goa) that were facing closure, have got a respite," Parrikar told reporters.
Earlier in the day, he held a series of meetings with the liquor traders and other affected bodies including the Travel and Tourism Association of Goa (TTAG).
He stated that the government has already begun analysing the order.
Also Read
However, a bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar, made it clear that its December 15, 2016 order banning such vends within 500 metres of highways shall remain operative for areas other than specified in the latest order.
"We are contemplating the possibility of approaching the SC for proper clarification (on the order), and possibly (seek) some special consideration for the state," Parrikar added.
In the wake of the apex court order, the state government is working out a strategy to protect the affected vends from the impact.
"The government will not charge any additional fees from such establishments that file applications to shift their premises outside 500 metres or 220 metres (which is the distance criteria mentioned in the SC order)," he said.
The state government has also "kept open the option" for the affected liquor outlets to sell their licenses to other persons, provided the new licensee operates from the premises which are outside the banned areas.
"The facility to shift to new premises or sell licenses would be made available for three years from now," the chief minister said.
He said the state government will also take a review of a notification pertaining to highways.
He said that the concerned departments have been asked to study files and give exact status about the highways in Goa.
Parrikar said that wholesale licence holders, distributors and distilleries are not covered under the SC order "as it mentions only about the sale to the consumers."
"The special zones like Naval enclaves, airport and other areas where common people do not have access will not be covered under this (apex court's) order," he added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content