Rural Development Minister Chaudhary Birender Singh sought to downplay the opposition to the bill, saying "any organisation be it related to our party or others are not saying that the 2013 law is the ultimate.
"This is not their contention. They are saying that we have also some suggestions in the interest of farmers. They should be incorporated."
"If any suggestion comes in relation to any clause, we are ready to consider it in farmers' interest.... There is no such rigidity on our part that we are not willing accept if there is anything good," Singh said when asked about the demands to restore consent clause and Social Impact Assessment
Singh's remarks came in the backdrop of at least three NDA allies and four RSS affiliated organisations voicing concern over removal of consent clause and social impact assessment (SIA) provisions from the bill.
More From This Section
While Shiv Sena, the second largest constituent of NDA after BJP, has, for quite some time, been on record seeking incorporation of a clause providing for 70 per cent consent of farmers in the bill, Shiromani Akali Dal and Swabhimani Paksha have written to the panel headed by S S Ahluwalia that "not an inch" of land should be acquired without the consent of farmers.
Singh said that if the suggestions are good and in the interest of farmers, the government has no problem in accepting them.
"But right now the issue is before the Committee. Once the committee gives its report, then we will see and if good suggestions come in the interest of the farmers, we are ready to accept it. Earlier also I had said this. Even the Prime Minister had said so," he said.
"In a Parliamentary democracy, communication is required. What is correct should be accepted. Government as well as Opposition should accept it.