Tearing into the opposition charge that imposition of the levy was killing the trade, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley refuted the allegations saying when items of common use were being taxed, how could luxury items be kept out.
Asserting that there was absolutely no harassment of artisans, Jaitley said corporate jewellers with up to Rs 12 crore turnover last year and up to Rs 6 crore turnover in this fiscal were exempt from it.
Replying to a calling attention on the issue, the Minister said "when there is excise duty on items like soap, toothpaste, razor, pencil, ink, fruit juices and baby food, why should the luxury items be exempted from it."
Opposition members had charged the government of killing the traditional jewellery trade and promoting the big brands by imposing the levy and later Congress and SP members walked out of the House. The jewellers have been on a nationwide strike for over 40 days to protest the levy.
Also Read
He said the opposition should understand that it is a complex subject and when taxes are levied on items like steel, cement and clothes, luxury items cannot be out of its purview.
"We have to decide on which items we will impose excise duty and if there is any structured trade, they do not get the right to resort to agitation against tax," he said and challenged the opposition that if they were so concerned about it, they should get the 5 per cent VAT removed in Kerala.
Dismissing charges that excise duty has hit hard small artisans, the Minister said the trade has not developed such that annual turnovers of small jewellers has crossed Rs 6 crore and stressed that "this is implemented on big chains."
The Finance Minister said the levy was a step towards
implementation of GST and if luxury items were not taxed, "you can never reach 18 per cent (GST rate) cap."
Refuting the opposition charges of harrassment of jewellers by excise officials, Jaitley said, "if any excise official or Khaki dressed men harrasses, any jeweller just needs to click a snap on their mobile and send it to me."
To address their concerns, the government has even formed a committee, headed by former Chief Economic Advisor Ashok Lahiri, and three of the representatives of jewellers will be included in it. It is upto the jewellers to decided on their representatives as there are dozens of organisations, Jaitley said.
Statistics show that consumption of gold is highest by those in the higher income group compared to those in the lower income group and thus the levy of excise duty would not affect small consumers.
The Finance Minister said that a peculiar aspect of gold trade is "the bigger the ban, the higher the smuggling". So government has allowed even small jewellers to import as the UPA government had allowed only 6-7 importers to do so.
"Domestic demand of gold is almost solely met by imports. During last three years, imports of gold were 625 MT, 1100 MT and 936 MT resulting in substantial outflow of precious foreign exchange," Jaitley said.
He added "gold attracts import duty of 10 per cent. Gold jewellery attracts 15 per cent import duty. However, India has signed FTA with many countries, wherein import of gold jewellery is allowed at nil preferential rate of import duty. ...This levy will result in 12.5 per cent CVD on imports of jewellery, checking these imports and providing additional protection to domestic industry."