The actor says working in off-beat films requires artists to make lot of sacrifices and hence a support is necessary.
"You have to live through it, make your own sacrifices. You can't keep doing that when there is no support whatsoever. Even if not the industry, if there was government support like they did with the NFDC from the 70s to the 80s.
"Even if that much was there, it would support a parallel movement, but no (that did not happen)," Abhay told PTI in an interview.
"When the government supported NFDC (National Film Development Corporation of India), there was this little spark because there was some security, some guarantee of film release. Now that's taken away from them. While it would be ideal for the mainstream industry to give that support, they don't have to (give it necessarily)."
Also Read
"They (mainstream industry) are perfectly fine where they are. There is an audience for them too. But if a government support came in, with the thought that let's have a variety of representations across communities and ideas...That is something our governing body needed to do," he said.
The 40-year-old "Aisha" star said with time it got extremely difficult for him to do the kind of films he believed in.
"People accepted me for taking risks, so, then I didn't want to stop taking risks because I would disappoint the very base that I have. I didn't know how to tell people that 'Hey it's not as if I don't want to take a risk, but it's damn hard to do it'."
numbers, people are becoming averse to taking risks, and hence it is more difficult for off-beat films to co-exist with huge commercial projects.
"It is very difficult to have a parallel formula against the mainstream one. Every year, as more and more capitalist we get, the more risk averse people are going to get. It's all about money."
When asked if he believes the indie cinema movement has improved from what it was earlier, Abhay said, "It's the same stage, same individuals every now and then with their hard work and effort have managed to come up with one product here, one there. That's all it is."
"She asked me what happened to the movement. I was glad she didn't single out me, she was wise enough to know that it's the larger industry that supports it. I was like, there was no 'movement'. It was always individual efforts.
"Like me, there were other like-minded individuals who were passionate about putting on screen what their vision was. But when you have just one person here, one person there, not united, with no government support, no foundation, it can only go in one instance here, one instance there. It can never be consistent and will never sustain itself," he said.