Sources in the government said today the apex court is likely to be told that to usher in transparency, the Supreme Court collegium should record the reasons for selection or rejection of a candidate and the same should be put in public domain, according to a draft response framed by the government.
The SC collegium decides on the appointment of High Court judges, their transfer and promotion as Chief Justice of a High Court and their elevation to the apex court based on the suggestions made by judges of that high court and SC justices who had earlier worked there.
The government may also tell the apex court to define the criteria for selection of judges for the higher judiciary and it must be part of the memorandum of procedure.
While one memorandum of procedure -- an executive order drafted after the collegium came into being over 20 years ago -- deals with high courts, the other deals with the Supreme Court.
Also Read
The government may also suggest bringing the decisions of the collegium under the ambit of the Right to Information Act, though its plans to ask the SC to record the decisions of the collegium and put them in public domain goes beyond the requirements of the right to information law .
Law Minister D V Sadananda Gowda today met top law officers and senior functionaries of the Law Ministry to give a final shape to the government's response to Supreme Court seeking suggestions for improving the collegium system. Gowda could also consult some of his senior Cabinet colleagues tonight on the issue.
Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi will carry the final word of the government to the Supreme Court tomorrow.
A review petition against the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act and the 99th constitutional amendment Act has also been filed in the apex court by advocate Mathew J Nedumbara.