With money cobbled together from Haiti's transitional government, the troubled country's Provisional Electoral Council hopes to organize two rounds of voting for president, some members of parliamentand numerous municipal seats. A first-round presidential redo is scheduled for October 9, the authorities said yesterday.
The impoverished Caribbean nation has relied on the US and other international partners to fund much of its balloting costs. This time around, they are trying to go it alone after international partners disagreed with the decision to annul last year's disputed presidential vote.
They currently have some USD 6.5 million in an election fund. He said he didn't foresee problems organizing a redo vote in October.
"We are doing the best we can to have a different kind of election than we've had in Haiti over the past 29 years," Antoine told The Associated Press. He said a Haitian electoral council never publicly released an election budget before.
More From This Section
Last month, Washington announced it had suspended funding assistance for the redo balloting in Haiti. US taxpayers already contributed USD 33 million for a three-round Haitian electoral cycle that was supposed to be resolved months ago.
Kenneth Merten, the State Department's special coordinator for Haiti, said the US was disappointed with the decision to redo the vote because drifting Haiti could have avoided its latest leadership muddle if it had stuck to earlier timetables.
In an interview this week, Merten said he thought it was ultimately "a good thing for Haiti to take full ownership of its electoral process."
As far as US officials can glean, Merten said, the revamped Provisional Electoral Council appeared to be "diligently working" to get the elections done on the latest timetable.
Merten said Washington regretted that the European Union has decided not to send an observer mission. The Organization of American States still plans to send monitors.
Analysis by international observers found that last year's presidential vote had various organizational shortcomings but that those problems didn't have an impact on the outcome. That contrasted sharply with local observers who alleged rampant fraud.