A bench of justices Gita Mittal and Anu Malhotra decided to take up the applications for additional evidence after the lawyers for the accused in the case opposed the plea.
During the hearing, Swamy said he wanted to examine the then District Magistrate (DM), who is now an election officer, and also the then SSP of the district who has since retired. He claimed that a then minister of state in the central government was present in the district at the time of the incident, which could be confirmed by examining the DM.
Meanwhile, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), which has intervened in the matter to seek further probe into the incident, said the Uttar Pradesh government in its affidavit of January 4 has not said on whose direction the "weeding out" or "destruction" of documents, like duty and attendance registers and log books of that day, had taken place.
Also Read
However, advocates Zafaryab Jilani and Ramkishor Singh Yadav, who appeared for the state government, said the list contained the names of the platoon personnel also.
On the last date of hearing on December 15, the court had expressed concern over claims of destruction of evidence regarding the identity of police personnel who were involved in the massacre.
It was earlier argued on behalf of NHRC and the victims that investigation by the state was shoddy and the UP government had not furnished documents to establish the identity of the accused.
On March 21, 2015, a trial court had given the benefit of doubt and acquitted 16 former PAC personnel accused of killing 42 people in Meerut, saying lack of evidence has failed to establish their identification.
16 accused acquitted in the case were alive while three had died during the trial.