A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and G P Mittal freed Bihar native Munna Pandit saying, "We do not think that in the facts of the present case, the onus by any stretch can be put on to Munna to explain and state how the deceased was murdered. This would be contrary to law."
"We do not think that in the facts of the present case last seen or missing link evidence theory relying upon Section 106 of the Evidence Act is applicable," the court said.
"They did not have any argument or quarrel. He came to know about the murder of his brother through his roommates and they might have killed him," it noted.
The trial court had convicted and awarded the jail term to Munna after relying on evidence that the victim was last seen with him and he had ill-will against his brother.
More From This Section
While rejecting the plea of Munna that he had not murdered his brother Meghnath Pandit, the trial court had said when two persons are in a room and one of them is murdered, the other one needs to explain who killed the victim.
Few days before the incident, a quarrel had taken place between the brothers when Munna's son had died and he had asked for some money from Meghnath to go to his village which he had refused, it had said.
The police had said on the day of the incident, an argument took place between the two brothers and Munna killed Meghnath with a thick wooden stick.
He had lodged a false FIR with the police saying when he had gone for work, four-five men murdered his brother.