Siby Mathews contended there were sufficient reasons for the arrest of the petitioner and former ISRO scientist Nambi Narayanan and other accused in the case.
He stated that he had retired from service and was now holding the office of Chief Information Commissioner.
"There is no master and servant relation between the government and the appellant. Hence, the direction of the single judge to the government to reconsider the issue will only be a futile course of action," he stated.
The High Court had on October 20 quashed the order dropping action against Mathews and two others who investigated the case initially and directed it to reconsider the decision exonerating the officials.
More From This Section
Allowing the petition by Nambi Narayanan, former ISRO scientist and an accused in the case, Justice A V Ramakrishna Pillai had remitted the matter back to the government for reconsideration and issuing formal orders in three months.
The judge had stated that the state government, which was 'enthusiastic' in withdrawing the case from CBI and handing it over to state police, had not taken the note of investigative lapses by Kerala police 'seriously' as could be seen from the records.
"The kind of seriousness as expected from a welfare state was not shown by the state. The conduct of the state was not above board. It does not conform with the known pattern of a responsbile government bound by a rule of law," the court had held.
The senior scientist had been accused of being involved in the espionage case but was later discharged.
CBI had recommeded action against the three SIT officials 15 years ago but action had not yet been taken against them.