In an interim order, Justice Indermeet Kaur granted the relief to Tuseed by allowing him to contest the polls to be held on September 12.
The court listed for September 28, his main petition challenging the rejection of his nomination by the DU Chief Election Officer's (CEO) on grounds of disciplinary action. The detailed order would come later.
Earlier in the day, the high court posed searching questions to the Delhi University (DU) for rejecting the nomination of the Congress-affiliate NSUI's presidential candidate for the upcoming students' body elections.
"The petitioner says he was warned by Shivaji College and it was not a disciplinary action which this court is finding to be true. I don't understand how can it be a disciplinary action. By no stretch of imagination, it can be put as a disciplinary action," the judge said while hearing the arguments.
Also Read
Senior advocate P Chidambaram, appearing for Tuseed, argued how the CEO can reject his nomination on the basis of an anonymous complaint.
He argued that in view of the Lyngdoh Committee guidelines, a person is not eligible for contesting polls if he has been convicted in any criminal offence and there should be no disciplinary action against him.
Senior advocate Sudhir Nandrajog, appearing for DU and CEO office, opposed the plea saying it was not maintainable and the university has been wrongly made a party.
"A student is not necessarily sent behind bars. He was barred from entering the college. What is this if not a disciplinary action? He was called along with his mother and he has apologised," the counsel argued.
National Students Union of India (NSUI) candidate Tuseed's nomination was cancelled on September 6.
He had said he has contested elections earlier too for the Department of Buddhist Studies' students body and hence should be allowed to contest the DUSU elections.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content