Under the provisions of law, 'Khoti land' is described as a property owned by zamindars or landlords.
The direction was given recently by a bench headed by Chief Justice Dr Manjula Chellur and Justice M S Sonak, who asked the Collector of Mumbai Suburban District to treat the public interest litigation (PIL), filed by activist Bhushan Samant, on the 'Khoti land' issue as a representation and decide upon it within four months.
"Afterthedepartment concerned takes a final call on the representation of the petitioner,itwould be just and proper for us to consider whether there is application of mind on the part of authorities in analysing the factual situation vis-a-vis the law relied upon by the petitioner," it said.
Also Read
According to the petitioner, there is encroachment by trespassing on these lands.
However, the court felt that mere description of these lands as 'Khoti' may not allow anyone to say that it is in the hands of unauthorised occupants unless there is application of mind vis-a-vis facts of a particular case with reference to the provisions of law.
The petitioner contended that the information received
It was contended that inspite of approaching the authorities with all the information obtained under RTI Act, they have slept over the matter without enquiring into the representation forwarded to them.
According to the petitioner, several apartments have come up on these lands. He also annexed photographs to support his contention.
The petitioner further contended that on the date of Maharashtra Khoti Abolition Act coming into force in 1949, the Khoti tenure shall, wherever it prevails, be deemed to have been abolished.
Moreover, section 8 of the Act says that uncultivated and waste lands vest with the government, the PIL added.