Allowing a petition from R Sankar, Justice D Hariparanthaman quashed the orders of the TNEB, rejecting his representations for compassionate appointment.
While working as Wireman, pthe etitioner's father died on October 28, 1992.
At the time of death of his father, the petitioner was only 14 years. The mother of the petitioner made an application to settle the terminal benefits and also to provide compassionate appointment to the petitioner. Since no order was passed, either granting or refusing compassionate appointment, the petitioner on attaining the age of majority, made a representation in June 1999 to provide appointment.
Again in July 2007, the petitioner sent another representation. However, the TNEB in May 2010 rejected his request on the ground that he failed to make representation for compassionate appointment within three yeas from the date of his father and further, he did not attain the age of 18 years as on the date of completion of three years from the date of death of his father.
Also Read
Challenging this, the petitioner filed the present petition.
The judge said the mother of the petitioner made a representation in April 1993. Therefore, there was no substance in the plea of TNEB that the application for compassionate appointment was made beyond three years. This court in J Jeba Mary case has considered various judgments and held that in those judgments, that the first representation should be taken into account and the later representation cannot be taken to reject the same on the ground that the same was made belatedly.