Hearing the PIL and a counter affidavit of petitioner Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Justice R R Prasad fixed January 31 for further hearing with a direction to the petitioner to come with specific points on which he wanted investigation against Kumar and Tiwari.
As per the High Court direction on an earlier date, the petitioner in his counter affidavit gave the list of witnesses and fodder accused who had purportedly "given statements" against Kumar and Tiwari.
It's reply came after the court asked the investigation agency why Kumar and Tiwari should not be arraigned as accused in the scam.
The CBI had also informed the bench that a lower court had twice rejected the plea of the petitioner, whose PIL sought to make Kumar and Tiwari as accused in the scam as they had allegedly been paid money.