Yadav had spent four days in jail from December 3, 2013 till December 6, 2013 after which a division bench of the High Court had suspended the sentence on his appeal.
A bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Deepa Sharma upheld the sentence awarded by a single judge in December 2013, saying Yadav's "failure to follow procedure cannot be countenanced" as despite being given adequate time to explain his conduct "he resorted to falsehood".
"In these circumstances, this court is of the view that the complaint about failure to follow the procedure prescribed cannot be countenanced; the appellant was furnished appropriate and adequate opportunity to explain his conduct, but instead he resorted to falsehood," the court said.
The bench also said that "when the appellant (Yadav) was afforded abundant opportunities to make amends, the conduct which he displayed was deplorable, to put it mildly".
More From This Section
The single judge bench, which was hearing the recovery suit, had taken exception to the affidavit filed by Yadav on December 2, 2013 which was allegedly falsely prepared and contained forged signatures of his wife.
Annoyed by the affidavit, the court had ordered that Yadav be sent to jail for 10 days for contempt and directed that his wife, who had appeared with their child before the court, be kept in the office of the Registrar General till the rising of the court.